The Latest:

Trump risks losing Senate vote over border emergency declaration: He should veto and move forward

By Jon Dougherty

The Democrat-controlled House is expected to pass legislation Tuesday or Wednesday overturning POTUS Donald Trump’s declaration of a national emergency along the U.S.-Mexico border, as expected, but he’s also running into increased opposition in the GOP-controlled Senate.

In an op-ed on Monday in the Washington Post (of course), Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., announced that should the House measure pass and make it to the upper chamber he would vote to support it, becoming one of at least three Republicans who have vowed to side with Democrats, the other two being familiar to RINO watchers: Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine.

Democrats only need four Republican defections in the Senate to pass the blocking legislation, which only needs a simple majority.

Tillis proclaimed, “I would vote in favor of the resolution disapproving of the president’s national-emergency declaration, if and when it comes before the Senate.”

He added:

President Trump has few bigger allies than me when it comes to supporting his vision of 21st-century border security, encompassing a major investment in technology, personnel and infrastructure, including new physical barriers where they will be effective. […]

From the perspective of the chief executive, I can understand why the president would assert his powers with the emergency declaration to implement his policy agenda. After all, nearly every president in the modern era has similarly pushed the boundaries of presidential power, many with the helping hand of Congress.

In fact, if I were the leader of the Constitution’s Article II branch, I would probably declare an emergency and use all the tools at my disposal as well. But I am not. I am a member of the Senate, and I have grave concerns when our institution looks the other way at the expense of weakening Congress’s power. 

Tillis noted further, “There is no intellectual honesty in now turning around and arguing that there’s an imaginary asterisk attached to executive overreach — that it’s acceptable for my party but not thy party,” he said, reminding Republican lawmakers that Democrats will one day control the White House again and use Trump’s national emergency declaration as precedent to “advance a policy that couldn’t gain congressional approval.”

While Tillis’ prediction may come true — Democrats could, of course, win the Oval Office again someday — his reluctance to support the president’s declaration belies certain other truths that he’s chosen to ignore.

Namely, President Obama’s executive actions, most notably on immigration, countermanded federal law making them illegal and unconstitutional, whereby POTUS Trump’s emergency declaration is well within the law and within his authority.

Even if a Democratic president will sit in the White House again at some point, Republicans may be in control of Congress, giving the Legislative Branch the same opportunity to vote to overturn his or her declaration if it’s believed by a majority of lawmakers to be inappropriate.

Finally, Tillis doesn’t address the fact that the president was elected on a platform of building a “big, beautiful wall” along portions of the U.S.-Mexico border, and, importantly, that Congress has repeatedly refused to provide him with the funds to do so, leaving him little choice other than an emergency declaration.

While lawmakers debate whether there is a “true emergency” along the border, it’s become plain to most Americans that something must be done to curb illegal immigration and drug smuggling. And support for physical boundaries is rising.

POTUS Trump should veto any attempt to stop him from declaring his emergency a) because he has the legal authority to do so; b) Congress won’t work with him on funding; and c) he’ll win in federal court.

Never miss a story! Sign up for our daily email newsletter — Click here!


4 Comments on Trump risks losing Senate vote over border emergency declaration: He should veto and move forward

  1. David Farrar // February 26, 2022 at 9:00 am // Reply

    Pres. Trump is not usurping the power of Congress. We have equal branches of government. The executive branch has its constitutional part to play should Congress fail to act to the satisfaction of the executive branch.

    Since Obama issued 12 vetoes during his presidency, one of which was overridden by Congress, Pres. Trump should be proud, as I know he is, to use his first to secure our borders.

  2. Trump didnt suddenly TAKE this power out of thin air, congress PASSED A LAW in 1976 granting him this power, he is merely exercising it. This specific legislation is aimed narrowly at this president, it would get A LOT more votes if it expanded more broadly to simply take away the emergency declaration power by any president ever.

    Sen Tillis, if you wish to take your power back, go full bore and take ALL of it back, dont be a wuss and try to take back partial power, so you dont have to deal with the responsibility of the hard decisions when emergencies take place.

    Congress gave this power, just like they have given so much of their power over the years to the presidency specifically to defer responsibility away from then, in efforts to ensure their own re-elections.

    so to any senator or congressman, take back your power, along with it the responsibility, but take the full measure of both, or shut the hell up.

  3. Of course, protecting our national borders is 100% within the president’s authority. Additionally, if the anti-Trumpers don’t believe that the current invasion of our southern border is not a national emergency, I do hope they attempt to define exactly what constitutes an ’emergency’, so that the voters can understand their motives.

  4. DeathMerchant // February 26, 2022 at 11:46 am // Reply

    The level of greed, corruption and the influence of special interests in this government is palpable.

Have something to say?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: