Hillary Clinton lawyers ask appeals court to overturn judge’s ruling that she be deposed by Judicial Watch

As Fitton has noted, it's clear why Clinton was never held accountable by Obama

By Tank Murdoch

(TNS) Lawyers for Hillary Clinton have asked D.C. Circuit appeals court to overturn an earlier decision by a lower court ordering her and longtime aide Cheryl Mills to be deposed by legal watchdog group Judicial Watch.



Lawyers for Clinton and Mills filed a “Petition for Writ of Mandamus” on Friday, according to the group’s website, after U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth, a Reagan appointee, granted Judicial Watch’s request for their depositions about Clinton’s emails and Benghazi attack records.



“This desperate act is yet another attempt by the Clinton machine to delay truth and accountability for her email conduct and how it impacted the people’s ‘right to know’ under FOIA,” or the Freedom of Information Act, stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

The group noted further:

The Clinton request comes in Judicial Watch’s lawsuit that seeks records concerning “talking points or updates on the Benghazi attack” (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01242)). Judicial Watch famously uncovered in 2014 that the “talking points” that provided the basis for Susan Rice’s false statements were created by the Obama White House. This Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit led directly to the disclosure of the Clinton email system in 2015.

You Might Like

On March 3, 2020, Judge Lamberth granted Judicial Watch’s request to depose Clinton about her emails and Benghazi attack documents. The court also ordered the deposition of Mills and two other State Department officials. Additionally, the court granted Judicial Watch’s request to subpoena Google for relevant documents and records associated with Clinton’s emails during her tenure at the State Department.

In mid-December, Lamberth first ordered a rare discovery into whether Clinton’s use of a private email server was a result of her attempt to try and hide her activities from the FOIA process; whether the State Department she once led under President Obama intended to settle the case in late 2014 and early 2015 amounted to bad faith; and “whether the State Department has adequately searched for records responsive” to JW’s initial request.

There are plenty of reasons to suspect that the State Department, now led by President Trump’s nominee, Mike Pompeo, is still acting in a manner to defend Clinton despite obvious misconduct, according to JW.

In December, Lamberth  ruled that the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.”

And yet, the State and Justice Departments” continued to defend Clinton’s and the agency’s email conduct,” JW said in its press release.

“Discovery up until this point has brought to light a noteworthy amount of relevant information, but Judicial Watch requests an additional round of discovery, and understandably so. With each passing round of discovery, the Court is left with more questions than answers,” Lamberth wrote Dec. 18, rejecting State and Justice requests to limit discovery.

Lamberth added that the behavior of both departments — which are still moving to shield Clinton from further scrutiny despite the fact that JW continues to uncover evidence indicating misconduct — is itself troubling.

You Might Like

“[T]here is still more to learn. Even though many important questions remain unanswered, the Justice Department inexplicably still takes the position that the court should close discovery and rule on dispositive motions. The Court is especially troubled by this,” he wrote.

“To argue that the Court now has enough information to determine whether State conducted an adequate search is preposterous, especially when considering State’s deficient representations regarding the existence of additional Clinton emails. Instead, the Court will authorize a new round of discovery,” Lamberth added.

“The Court agrees with Judicial Watch – it is time to hear directly from Secretary Clinton,” he wrote.


  • Check out FREE Trump 2020 gear — just pay S & H! Click here

As Fitton has noted, it’s clear why Clinton was never held accountable by Obama: He knew about her secret email account from the beginning, and his White House helped hide the fact that she was using one — in violation of open records laws and requirements.

Watch:

GOT SOMETHING TO SAY? COMMENT BELOW


6
Leave a Reply

avatar
6 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of
.50cal
Guest
.50cal

America needs a few thousand Tom Fitton(s).

I’ve already said my piece on the satanic baby-eating monster. She’ll be boiling in excrement with some demons in h3ll.

boyd
Guest
boyd

THAT BITCH NEEDS TO BE BROUGHT BEFORE A CONSTITUTIONAL JUDGE “NOW” AND FACE THE MUSIC JUST LIKE ANY OTHER AMERICAN. THIS COUNTRY IS GETTING SICK AND TIRED OF HER PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT WHILE SHE HERSELF THINKS SHE IS UNTOUCHABLE. NO SINGLE WOMAN IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MORE CORRUPT, DEVIOUS, ILLEGAL, TREASONOUS UNCONSTITUTIONAL DEALINGS THAN EVIL-HILLARY. SHE NEEDS TO GO DOWN, NOW, AND PUT BEHIND BARS FOR THE REST OF HER LIFE WITH ALL THE OTHER WOMEN IN PRISON FOR MISDEEDS (AND NOT A CUSHY SPECIAL PRISON), IF NOT PUT TO DEATH FOR TREASON WHICH SHE HAS COMMITTED NUMEROUS TIMES. THIS WAS HOW… Read more »

marie
Guest

WHY ARE THEY NOT HELD FOR TREASON,AND GIVEN THE PENALTY OF THE LAW???

Silence DoGood
Guest
Silence DoGood

I truly hope that she is getting worried. I would like nothing more than to see justice come upon her and her criminal empire.

ELF
Guest
ELF

GO TOM FITTON !
But watch your back . You don’t want to be Arkinsided.

Daniel Silvan
Guest
Daniel Silvan

Her reaction is just what you would expect from her. It’s much like a vampire’s reaction to a cross, which is an appropriate comparison.

%d bloggers like this: