By Jon Dougherty
(TNS) Conservatives should get to know the name Sam Gerstmann. We think you’re going to hear a lot about him — and from him — in the future.
Sam has just released a video in which he explains the origins of the Second Amendment like a boss, shearing liberal lies in the process with facts, historical references, and a grasp of the Constitution that escapes some academics too wound up in their Leftist political ideology.
- Check out “The CATASTROPHIC CURRENCY RESET: Where to be in the U.S. and Abroad When The SHTFâ€Â — download for FREE in Crisis Reports
Sam’s obviously done his homework.
At 15, he knows more about the Second Amendment and its origins than most. And when it comes to exposing the Left’s gun control agenda, his spot-on presentation of facts, figures, and common sense you seldom see in young adults destroys their pathetic, politicized positions.
“The Second Amendment is one of the most important rights that the American people have,” he explains on YouTube.
Survival Legion Tee: $25.99
“However, in order for liberals and the left to further their anti-gun, pro-gun control argument, they will often lie about it to paint a false narrative. As conservatives, understanding these lies and how they are incorrect is very important for the purpose of defending our fundamental freedoms, which is what this video outlines,” continues.
Give Sam a listen. And remember his name as you consider subscribing to this young man’s YouTube channel.
GOT SOMETHING TO SAY? COMMENT BELOW
A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
—James Madison
I bet Santa brings him a nice AR-15 for Christmas. A nice LMT rifle.
Outstanding summary of what the 2nd amendment is all about. There are two instances of the civilian militia actually preventing an invasion. 1) In the war of 1812, while the British were bombing Fort McHenry, civilians (the unregulated militia) poured into the greater Baltimore area from all over Maryland and surrounding states. If they hadn’t been present, the British would probably have just bypassed the fort crushed Baltimore altogether. 2) During WWII, the Japanese could have easily invaded the west coast. Why didn’t they? After it was over, senior officers of the Imperial Japanese Navy put it very eloquently. “There… Read more »
If this is true where is your “well-regulated militia”. Even you don’t quite get it but your at least pointed in the right direction.
So anytime someone says I support the 2nd Amendment then ask them where is your “well-regulated militia”?
And citizens arming themselves by buying guns is NOT a “well-regulated militia”.
Did you listen?
Yes,it was not specifically addressed. But some how it’s just about you owning a gun. Good, but do you know how to work it as a “well-regulated militia” and for the “security of a free State”.
Do you know how to go about it?
An armed people can easily form a militia. That is the point. That is why people from an armed populance are called citizens. A disarmed population cannot easily form a militia. That is why they are called subjects. The Patriots who flooded the streets and instantaneously formed a militia would have been powerless had they been disarmed. Ditto the farmers and tradesmen who formed a militia at Concord. And those that the Japanese Navy feared would arise if they invaded California during WWII.
An armed population can…. Umm no. That is why they never tell you to create one.
You’ll wake up neighbor by neigbhor as they go to each household disarming you. Surprise!
Most communities have no idea who is armed and who is not. What a Militia!
But government and police do and they are NOTt he Militia and they’ll come quietly and disarm each one INDIVIDUALLY if worst comes to worst.
Those with mental acuity have no problem understanding the concept of the 2nd amendment. Those that DON’T have mental acuity DO have a problem understanding the concept of the 2nd amendment. I see that you DON’T understand the 2nd amendment. 2+2=4. Does that help any?
Every time I mention it is required as part of the 2nd Amendment they seem to ignore it but seem to FOOLY understand they own a gun.
Look daddy, I got a gun. A gun for what?
A well-regulated militia being necessary for the SECURITY of a free State….
Blather is an appropriate screen name for you. your very last sentence is absolutely incorrect. “well regulated” means “well equipped”. If you think 300 million guns in this country doesn’t make the populace well equipped, let’s hope you never have to find out. Lastly, nowhere does the 2nd amendment state that the right to bear arms is contingent upon maintaining a militia.
Umm no. it does NOT. You guyz do everything NOT to make a well-regulated militia. Fooling yourself with self-imposed definitions that make you feel comfortable.
Scratching my head on this one. Why? It’s a requirment.
If you want the U.S. Code on “Militia”, you can find it here: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title10/subtitleA/part1/chapter12&edition=prelim What you don’t seem to understand is the “Militia” is not a prerequisite for the Liberty of Keeping and Bearing Arms. The 2nd Amendment is a right of the people, as is the entire Bill of Rights, specifically added to the Constitution to prevent the government from taking away these Liberties. “Arms” includes any weapon We The People might choose to use to protect our homes and families from any threat or to overthrow a tyrannical government when needed. “…Shall not be infringed” means that the… Read more »
Oh gawd, doing everything to NOT create a Militia and even coming up with made-up crap to suit your liking to any excuse NOT to create a well-regulated militia.
God help US all. But at least you got the “infringed” part right.
Mr. Blather, You must have missed this but I’m happy to help you out. In US Code Title 10, Section 311, you will find that the militia of the United States includes two parts - The unorganized militia incorporating ALL able bodied male citizens from the ages of 18 to 45, and the organized militia, otherwise known as the National Guard. As the National Guard is now used as a reserve component of the US Army, it is arguable that this part of the militia is indeed a militia. IOW, Mr. Blather, if you are a healthy citizen of the… Read more »
Um no. The National Guard theory has been debunked.
And you just farted on yourself when you said the “unorganized militia” is somehow part of the “organized” militia.
Wut?
The well regulated militia is the standing army that the POTUS commands. Our trained military. The armed citizenry keeps a balance of power, so the government cannot ever control all the firepower. Remember during the Revolutionary War, England tried to disarm the colonists so the people could not fight back.
Um no. Governors of EACH State is suppose to be in command of the well-regulated militia.
But since you guyz put in communist traitors all the time don’t know how that will work out.
Do you truly want Hillaryous or Joe Bit’m to tell Gavin Gruesome and other communist governors what to do?
Why, they would disarm the militia but lucky you don’t have one, eh?
That haircut used to be what we had to maintain for school code. That’s a good sign nowadays.
He probably has good parents, plays sports, and gets good marks in school. Keep up the clean-cut, All-American look. Nothing worse than seeing some kid with blue hair and assorted penis-rings in the face.
2nd amendnent. Helps keep our marxist Congress from getting too ambitious.
If not for IT, we WOULD be slaves to the central power.
Sam’s video is excellent and worth a moment of your time.
You don’t even need to get that deep into the weeds. When you have a leftie who tries to push the interpretation that the 2nd only applies to militias, just look at them and say, “so… you want us all to form militias to keep our guns? Are you sure about that?”