By Duncan Smith
The hard-left reactionaries who vote for Democrats don’t care a whit about the Constitution, tradition, honor, integrity, or the need for comity with political opposites in a country as diverse as the United States.
All they care about is power and, in particular, enough power to literally subdue their political opponents with brute-force authoritarianism
Historically, this approach hasn’t worked in other countries, but you can’t tell these reactionaries anything.
They don’t care much about history, either.
For whatever else she may be, Sen. Kirsten Sinema has been a godsend for this republic in more ways than one.
She’s an uber-liberal, without a doubt, but she’s also a pragmatist who is attempting to honestly serve the people of her state, even those who did not vote for her.
As such, she’s been opposed to nixing the filibuster, though the short-term thinking reactionaries in her party are pushing to get rid of it so they can literally jam their Marxist agenda down Americans’ throats.
That’s not a grand strategy, and Sinema went on “The View” Friday to explain why to the dimwit leftists on that show.
Joy Behar said: 'I think that voting rights are too crucial to just say, 'Well, we need to keep it for when we need it.' It's too important because if we don't have— if everyone in the country is not able to vote, you don't really have a country. Not only won't you have the filibuster, you won't have a country. So for me, it seems like it's an emergency right now that we get rid of the filibuster even though we might pay down the road. If we don't have voting rights, what do we got? Nothing.'
You know, Joy, I'm really glad that you followed up on this point. So I mentioned this in my op-ed in The Washington Post. If we were to eliminate the filibuster or create a so-called exception, which actually doesn't exist to you would have to limit the and filibuster in order to pass voting rights legislation — which just as a quick reminder, I'm a co-sponsor of that legislation, and I voted to support and advance it, continue to do so. If you eliminate the filibuster to pass that piece of legislation, then in four years or any time when the other party gains control, without the filibuster in place, all of those voting rights protections could be easily wiped out with a simple majority vote.
You could have a nationwide ban on mail-in voting. You could have requirements for voter I.D. at every level of government for every election throughout the country. So the thing to remember, and I know this can be really hard to do when we're feeling really worried about what's coming right in front of us, is to think a couple of years down the road on what it looks like if you remove this tool, this protection for the minority, what happens when you are the minority and that tool is no longer there to protect your rights? So the sense of urgency I think many of us share in wanting to protect voting rights, and we're all working to do this across the country, but eliminating this tool would result in very negative restrictions on voting rights in the future. So thinking about this from the long-term rather than the just right now term, I think, is really important. It's the way that I'm viewing this discussion.
Regardless of her personal politics — and again, she’s uber-liberal — Sinema has become a much-needed voice of reason at a time when her party has become extremely unreasonable.
Biden's inflation is GETTING WORSE by the month...
Around the world, supply chains continue to be disrupted. Delays are now commonplace. And they're going to get worse.
There IS a financial reset coming - that's just true. All the signs indicate as much.