By Tank Murdoch
(TNS) Lawyers for Hillary Clinton have asked D.C. Circuit appeals court to overturn an earlier decision by a lower court ordering her and longtime aide Cheryl Mills to be deposed by legal watchdog group Judicial Watch.
Lawyers for Clinton and Mills filed a â€œPetition for Writ of Mandamusâ€ on Friday, accordingÂ to the group’s website, after U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth, a Reagan appointee,Â granted Judicial Watchâ€™s request for their depositions about Clintonâ€™s emails and Benghazi attack records.
- Check outÂ â€œR.I.P. MIDDLE CLASS: Elite Globalists â€“ Enemies from Withinâ€Â â€”Â download for FREE inÂ Crisis Reports
â€œThis desperate act is yet another attempt by the Clinton machine to delay truth and accountability for her email conduct and how it impacted the peopleâ€™s â€˜right to knowâ€™ under FOIA,â€ or the Freedom of Information Act, stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
The group noted further:
The Clinton request comes in Judicial Watchâ€™sÂ lawsuitÂ that seeks records concerning â€œtalking points or updates on the Benghazi attackâ€ (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of StateÂ (No. 1:14-cv-01242)). Judicial Watch famously uncovered in 2014 that the â€œtalking pointsâ€ that provided the basis for Susan Riceâ€™s false statements wereÂ created byÂ the Obama White House. This Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuitÂ led directlyÂ to the disclosure of the Clinton email system in 2015.
On March 3, 2020, Judge LamberthÂ grantedÂ Judicial Watchâ€™s requestÂ to deposeÂ Clinton about her emails and Benghazi attack documents. The court also ordered the deposition of Mills and two other State Department officials. Additionally, the court granted Judicial Watchâ€™s request to subpoena Google for relevant documents and records associated with Clintonâ€™s emails during her tenure at the State Department.
In mid-December, Lamberth first ordered a rare discovery into whether Clinton’s use of a private email server was a result of her attempt to try and hide her activities from the FOIA process; whether the State Department she once led under President Obama intended to settle the case in late 2014 and early 2015 amounted to bad faith; and “whether the State Department has adequately searched for records responsive” to JW’s initial request.
There are plenty of reasons to suspect that the State Department, now led by President Trump’s nominee, Mike Pompeo, is still acting in a manner to defend Clinton despite obvious misconduct, according to JW.
In December, Lamberth Â ruledÂ that the Clinton email system was â€œone of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.â€
And yet, the State and Justice Departments” continued to defend Clintonâ€™s and the agencyâ€™s email conduct,” JW said in its press release.
“Discovery up until this point has brought to light a noteworthy amount of relevant information, but Judicial Watch requests an additional round of discovery, and understandably so. With each passing round of discovery, the Court is left with more questions than answers,” Lamberth wrote Dec. 18, rejecting State and Justice requests to limit discovery.
Lamberth added that the behavior of both departments — which are still moving to shield Clinton from further scrutiny despite the fact that JW continues to uncover evidence indicating misconduct — is itself troubling.
“[T]here is still more to learn. Even though many important questions remain unanswered, the Justice Department inexplicably still takes the position that the court should close discovery and rule on dispositive motions. The Court is especially troubled by this,” he wrote.
“To argue that the Court now has enough information to determine whether State conducted an adequate search is preposterous, especially when considering Stateâ€™s deficient representations regarding the existence of additional Clinton emails. Instead, the Court will authorize a new round of discovery,” Lamberth added.
“The Court agrees with Judicial Watch â€“ it is time to hear directly from Secretary Clinton,” he wrote.
- Check out FREE Trump 2020 gear â€” just pay S & H!Â Click here
As Fitton has noted, it’s clear why Clinton was never held accountable by Obama: He knew about her secret email account from the beginning, and his White House helped hide the fact that she was using one — in violation of open records laws and requirements.
— Jon Dougherty (@JonDougherty10) March 14, 2020
GOT SOMETHING TO SAY? COMMENT BELOW