By Jon Dougherty
(TNS) On Thursday, a clearly frustrated House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was asked by a reporter about the status of President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial in the Senate.
- Check out “DEEP STATE 2019: A New Generation of Scandalous Manipulation” — download for FREE in Crisis Reports
The answer she gave was astoundingly bizarre, but the reaction by the media in attendance was even more confounding.
Asked if President Trump will be “chastened” knowing “Congress is watching him” or “emboldened” by a Senate acquittal, Pelosi responded:
Well he will not be acquitted. You cannot be acquitted if you don’t have a trial and when you don’t have a trial if you don’t have witnesses and documentation.
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) January 30, 2022
Of course he’ll be “acquitted,” but not a single reporter in attendance challenged Pelosi’s purposely incorrect answer.
The United States Constitution provides that the House of Representatives “shall have the sole Power of Impeachment” (Article I, section 2) and that “the Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments…[but] no person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present” (Article I, section 3). The president, vice president, and all civil officers of the United States are subject to impeachment.
The Constitution does not say how the Senate must conduct its trial, as experts note.
But Pelosi isn’t the only top Democrat to say something like this. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has been saying similar things all week, as POLITICO noted:
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) delivered a similar refrain at his press conference across the Capitol on Thursday.
A trial “without the evidence, without witnesses and documents would render the president’s acquittal meaningless,” Schumer said as the Senate prepares to begin what could be its second-to-last day of proceedings.
The Senate’s vote to acquit Trump on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, he argued, would have a “giant asterisk next to it, because the trial was so rigged in his favor.”
But then POLITICO noted the true intent behind Pelosi’s and Schumer’s claims:
The argument — that Trump cannot be truly exonerated without a fair trial in the Senate — is clearly an attempt to undermine the White House’s victory lap after the president is acquitted, possibly as soon as Friday.
Schumer has been warning for weeks about the consequences of Republicans voting to acquit Trump through a “sham trial” without additional witnesses. But the closer the Senate gets to that possibility, the more Democrats have adopted that message and the sharper it gets.
“Any conclusion that doesn’t allow witnesses and documents is going to make the president’s acquittal — if it should happen — worth very, very little. Zero,” Schumer told reporters on Wednesday after the Senate’s first day of its question-and-answer session.
“You can’t convince the American people it was an acquittal if you don’t have witnesses and documents,” he said.
As with Pelosi, not a single reporter appeared to challenge Schumer’s contention that only witnesses would make the Senate trial ‘legitimate.’
It should be noted that former Vice President Joe Biden, as a U.S. senator in 1999, opposed witnesses in the impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton.
Per Fox News (and congrats to POLITICO for digging this up):
Politico obtained a memo on Thursday written by then-Delaware Sen. Biden in January 1999 that was sent to the Democratic caucus in the middle of the Clinton impeachment battle.
- Click here for the Internet’s greatest sports news aggregate – NFL, MLB, NHL, NBA, NCAA, MMA, Boxing, Horseracing, Auto Racing and more at NationalSportsDesk.com
“The Senate may dismiss articles of impeachment without holding a full trial or taking new evidence. Put another way, the Constitution does not impose on the Senate the duty to hold a trial,” Biden said to his Democratic colleagues. “In a number of previous impeachment trials, the Senate has reached the judgment that its constitutional role as a sole trier of impeachments does not require it to take new evidence or hear live witness testimony.”
When reporters don’t challenge politicians who make patently false, political statements about processes like impeachment, it leaves viewers and readers with a false impression. While we understand that is the point of the politician, to muddy the water, it’s the job of the press to clear it up.
- We need your help to grow, pure and simple. Share our stories, make sure to tell your friends about this site, and click the red bell in the right corner for push notifications.
GOT SOMETHING TO SAY? COMMENT BELOW