(TNS) Each and every ‘witness’ the Garbage Party has hauled before various House committees to rat out President Donald Trump forÂ something has subsequently been forced to admit that the man never broke a single U.S. law in his conduct with Ukraine.
- Check out â€œRETIREMENT DOOM AND SAVINGS GLOOM: Americans are Unprepared and Unaware!â€Â â€”Â download for FREE inÂ Crisis Reports
Even U.S. Ambassador to the EU Gordon Sondland admitted under oath that the presidentÂ specifically said he wanted “nothing” from Ukraine, “no quid pro quo.”
â€œOn September 9, 2019 â€¦ I asked the president: â€˜What do you want from Ukraine?â€™ The president responded, â€˜Nothing. There is no quid pro quo.â€™ The president repeated, â€˜No quid pro quoâ€™ multiple times. This was a very short call. And I recall the president was in a bad mood,â€ he testified.
So why are Democrats moving forward with impeachment anyway?
Oh, because they say the presidentÂ intendedÂ to violate the law, and you know, that’s good enough to satisfy the constitutional impeachment requirement of “high crimes and misdemeanors.”
Remember when President Trump first began calling this impeachment business a “witch hunt?”
THE IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS HAVE BECOME THE SALEM WITCH TRIALS – House Judiciary Committee Report: President Can Be Impeached for ‘Motives’ Without Breaking Law https://t.co/KKf1sAQZm6 via @BreitbartNews
— Bill Mitchell (@mitchellvii) December 8, 2019
The Conservative Treehouse expounded upon Democrats’ ‘you intended to so you did it anyway’ legal theory somewhat:
Defining statutory violations by the intent of the violator is specifically attributable to how President Obama, AG Eric Holder and AG Loretta Lynch changed the entire enterprise of lawful application to make outcomes arbitrary, variable, changeable to the situation.
The IRS targeting wasnâ€™t unlawful because it wasnâ€™t intentional.Â The death of four Americans due to sketchy CIA and State Dept. operations in Benghazi was not unlawful because the risky situation wasnâ€™t created intentionally.Â Hillary Clintonâ€™s private email server with classified information wasnâ€™t â€œintentionalâ€, etcetera â€“ etcetera, the list is long.
The nice thing about switching to definitions of lawbreaking by â€œintentâ€ is the ease in arbitrary application.Â Republican targets â€˜intendedâ€™ to violate lawsâ€¦ Democrat targets, well, not-so-much.Â Fluidity is a necessary oil amid a two-tiered administrative state.
And we keep hearing from the Garbage Party howÂ Trump is the tyrant authoritarian monarch wannabe?
If Democrats were in charge, the United States would resemble the second coming of the Soviet Union, were people were ‘guilty’ of offenses against the Communist realm if the realmÂ said they were guilty.
All the more reason to vote early and often in 2020 for Trump and Republicans.
- We need your help to grow, pure and simple. Share our stories, make sure to tell your friends about this site, and click the red bell in the right corner for push notifications.Â
GOT SOMETHING TO SAY? COMMENT BELOW