(TNS) We have long suspected the reason why President Trump’s first national security adviser, Michael Flynn — fired by Obama because he wouldn’t play 44’s games or take his BS — was never sentenced for his ‘crime’ of ‘lying’ to an FBI agent was because he didn’t lie to an FBI agent and was set up.
- Check out “Epic Duel of 21st Century: China vs USA – Trump Goes All In†— download for FREE in Crisis Reports
Come to find out now, according to new docs dropped by his lawyer, former federal prosecutor and whistleblower Sydney “Take No Prisoners” Powell, Flynn was screwed over by Obama’s deep state.
By former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, specifically.
TechnoFog on Twitter dropped the docs Thursday night. Looks like former FBI lawyer Lisa Page, whom Peter Strzok was involved with, was in on it as well (which means, in all likelihood, so was Strzok).
BREAKING – new @SidneyPowell1 filing in the Flynn case.
Lisa Page edited the Flynn 302.
James Clapper told WaPo reporter Ignatius to basically "take the kill shot on Flynn"
THREAD
cc @KerriKupecDOJ pic.twitter.com/YqEIsMUAiu
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) October 25, 2019
Identification of the (felony) leaker of the Flynn-Kislyak call?
ONA Director Col. James Baker "is believed to be the person who illegally leaked the transcript of Mr. Flynn's calls to Ignatius" pic.twitter.com/u27qDm92kT
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) October 25, 2019
Oh look…Strzok was in on it (allegedly — we have to say that):
Included: new Page/Strzok texts.
Discussion between Lisa Page and Peter Strzok re: editing the Flynn 302.
Strzok to Page: "I made your edits"
Also discussion of misleading leadership re: picking up 302. pic.twitter.com/w5wuU3SwZh
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) October 25, 2019
Remember hearing some time ago that the FBI agents (including Strzok) didn’t believe that Flynn had lied to them? Well, yeah, Page and Strzok discussed that too.
New Page/Strzok texts also include this post-Flynn interview analysis of Strzok.
This appears to confirm they left the interview thinking Flynn didn't lie. pic.twitter.com/Gw99uMMrku
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) October 25, 2019
More deviousness regarding an alleged conversation between Flynn and Russian Ambassador Kislyak that didn’t happen (this was the key allegation against Flynn — that he lied about a conversation with the ambassador that he didn’t recall having):
Manipulation of the Flynn 302 — two weeks after the interview. (1/24/17 vs 2/10/17; timeline key.)
Agent notes say Flynn wasn't sure he spoke to Kislyak on the UN vote.
The 302 says different. pic.twitter.com/Nf0xfi6FFZ
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) October 25, 2019
More on the 302: They added Kislyak's description of any Russian response to a request from Flynn.
Powell: "That question and answer do not appear in the [agent] notes" pic.twitter.com/04zjcMQnCP
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) October 25, 2019
And here’s where that “Democracy Dies in Darkness” rag, the Washington Post, played its dutiful role in all this:
Identification of the (felony) leaker of the Flynn-Kislyak call?
ONA Director Col. James Baker "is believed to be the person who illegally leaked the transcript of Mr. Flynn's calls to Ignatius" pic.twitter.com/u27qDm92kT
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) October 25, 2019
An out-and-out lie about what Flynn did and did not say:
The Flynn 302 doesn't even match the FBI Agents' notes.
Agent Notes: "I don't remember making 4-5 calls."
302: "Flynn remembered making four to give calls that day about this issue." pic.twitter.com/27WlXJ6gG6
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) October 25, 2019
We noted in December 2018 that the original FBI 302 ‘documenting’ Flynn’s interview was messed with.
Speaking of lying to federal agents and Congress being a crime, maybe lawyer Lisa Page should get herself an attorney:
Lisa Page lied to the DOJ about her edits to the Flynn 302.
"Page didn't recall whether she took part in editing the FD-302"
Upon seeing her texts, she "believes she must have seen it at some point…" pic.twitter.com/fgMaZcWnWa
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) October 25, 2019
Read the full motion here: https://t.co/EHgPYWUpK8
And follow Flynn attorney @molmccann – who I'm certain has been valuable to Sidney and Gen Flynn throughout this matter.
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) October 25, 2019
Now, you wait: The Garbage Party will claim all of this is ‘revenge’ for ‘impeaching Trump.’ But forget that noise; it’s expected. The guilty Alinskyites always claim their political enemies are guilty of the things they have done.
AG Bill Barr had better be convening a grand jury and typing up some indictments soon. Let’s see who flips on Clapper (and Brennan? and Comey? and…and….Obama?) first.
- We need your help to grow, pure and simple. Share our stories, make sure to tell your friends about this site, and click the red bell in the right corner for push notifications. We don’t do a regular ‘email newsletter’ anymore because it gets blocked.
About us (you should read this)
GOT SOMETHING TO SAY? COMMENT BELOW
Dang, need to start a rope factory for all these dirtbags.
These stories give me a hard on!!!! Thanks for the great work!!!
It’s a great report. But, Barr is still denying Flynn exculpatory evidence. I am unaware of any single legal action Barr has taken to fight the conspiracy.