By Jon Dougherty
(NationalSentinel) Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz has submitted a draft of his long-awaited report to the DoJ on alleged abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court during the tenure of fired FBI Director James Comey and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe as it relates to the “Spygate” scandal aimed at ousting President Donald Trump from office.
Horowitz recently informed lawmakers that he had submitted his final report for review to Attorney General William Barr, signaling that his probe has reached its conclusion.
â€œWe have now begun the process of finalizing our report by providing a draft of our factual findings to the department and the FBI for classification determination and marking,â€ Horowitz wrote in a Sept. 13Â letter addressed to several House and Senate Committee leaders.
â€œThis step is consistent with our process for reports such as this one that involve classified material.â€
Horowitz noted further that once DoJ and the FBI sends back a marked-up document highlighting classified information, the IG’s office will â€œproceed with our usual process for preparing final draft public and classified reports, and ensuring that appropriate reviews occur for accuracy and comment purposes.â€
Horowitz’s office has been looking into the FBI’s process to obtain FISA court surveillance warrants against a former member of President Trump’s 2016 campaign team, adviser Carter Page.
The FBI under Comey and McCabe first obtained a surveillance warrant during the waning weeks of President Obama’s administration, then renewed applications for surveillance at least three times after Trump defeated Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.
Earlier reports noted that Comey and others including former Justice Department Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein used the unverified “Russia dossier” paid for by the Clinton campaign and the DNC as justification for the FISA warrants.
If so, legal experts say, that could mean Comey and others are in legal jeopardy for purposely defrauding the FISA court in order to obtain their warrants.
In July during an appearance onÂ Fox News, Rep. John Ratcliffe said he had met with Horowitz who said his officeâ€™s probe into alleged abuses of the FISA court by the Obama-era DoJ and FBI was complete.
In addition, Ratcliffe said, the IGâ€™s office was currently drafting its report.
Meanwhile, â€œUnited States Attorney John Durham is looking at what happened in the late winter and spring of 2016,â€ said former Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), who was hosting the program.
AsÂ The National Sentinel reported Sept. 2, Comey — despite not being prosecuted for leaking sensitive information to the media regarding President Trump — isn’t out of the woods yet.
He wasÂ found by the Justice Department Inspector General to have violated several policies and rules in releasing, without proper authorization, a series of memos he wrote following meetings with President Donald Trump in early 2017.
FBI Assistant Director Kevin Brock, writing inÂ The Hill, noted that he believes Horowitz’s next report will contain some legitimate legal entanglements for Comey because he signed off on warrant applications filed before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court using â€˜evidenceâ€™ â€” the â€œRussia dossierâ€ â€” he himself testified was â€œsalacious and unverified.â€
Comey may try to deflect with celebratory comments that he wasnâ€™t charged with mishandling classified information, but he remains in a precarious position â€” and the trend lines arenâ€™t good.Â Â Â
Next up will be the IGâ€™s findings regarding Comeyâ€™sÂ truthfulness before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) courtÂ and whether he attested to false or misleading statements in order to electronically monitor a presidential campaign.Â
That determination may not be as cut-and-dried as many think it is, but it hopefully, at a minimum, will explain why Comey believed he could sign off multiple times on a FISA application based largely on information that he, himself, described as â€œsalacious and unverified.â€ His exposure here is potentially much more devastating than breaking FBI record retention and handling rules.Â (Related:Â Comey admitted his FBI did NOT corroborate bogus Trump dossier before getting FISA warrant)
Close behind the IGâ€™s second report will be findings by U.S. AttorneyÂ John DurhamÂ whether Comey and his rogue team of investigatorsÂ violated FBI and departmental guidelinesÂ to initiate a counterintelligence investigation into a presidential campaign. They will determine if Comey had adequate justification for launching such an unprecedented investigation.Â Â
But beyond that, Mr. Durham and his team likely will follow up on emerging indicators that Comey may have colluded with other intelligence community leaders to actually â€œmanufactureâ€ the justification needed for an investigation by targeting covert informants against campaign representatives in violation of established policies and procedures.Â Â
- Help us grow by spreading the word about The National Sentinel and sharing our stories far and wide! You can also help by subscribing to ourÂ YouTube channel, ourÂ Brighteon VideoÂ channel, and following us on social media platforms that donâ€™t censor us likeÂ MeWeÂ andÂ Parler.Â Also, sign up for our premium newsletterÂ The Daily SentinelÂ for FREE and never miss a story!Â Â
GOT SOMETHING TO SAY? COMMENT BELOW