By Jon Dougherty
(NationalSentinel) It’s been about a year since President Donald Trump teased the idea of declassifying virtually every document related to the “Spygate” scandal — a counterintelligence operation to keep him from winning office followed by a bona fide soft coup attempt to drive him out.
â€œThe documents to be declassified also include 12 FBI reportsÂ on interviewsÂ with Justice Department official Bruce Ohr and all FBI reports of interviews prepared in connection with all other applications to surveil Carter Page,â€ Fox News and other outlets reported.
But it didn’t happen. For some reason, the president was talked into delaying the declassification process.
Then again in May, POTUS instructedÂ the federal law enforcement and intelligence community to turn over all documents requested by Attorney General William Barr for declassification as they relate to â€œSpygate.”
We haven’t heard anything since. Meanwhile, the hostile establishment media and Democrats have sort of moved on from Spygate and the Mueller probe, settling on new strategies aimed at driving down the president’s polling numbers and, eventually, from office.
They are shifting their anti-Trump narrative back to “racist”, “white supremacist”, “xenophobe,” as the mainstream media screech “recession!” But it could be that the administration is getting ready to play some ‘trump cards’ (sorry).
Investigative reporter John Solomon ofÂ The Hill, who has been an extremely reliable source in terms of revealing new information related to Spygate, notes that should the president decide to release 10 documents and document chains, Democrats would be in heap big trouble.
And given Solomon’s timing — writing about this now — he may be tipping us off to what’s coming.
ViaÂ The Hill here’s what Solomon believes may be coming:
1.)Â Â Â Christopher Steeleâ€™s confidential human source reports at the FBI.Â These documents, known in bureau parlance as 1023 reports,Â show exactly what transpired each time Steele and his FBI handlers met in the summer and fall of 2016 to discuss his anti-Trump dossier. The big reveal, my sources say, could be the first evidence that the FBI shared sensitive information with Steele, such as the existence of the classifiedÂ Crossfire HurricaneÂ operation targeting the Trump campaign. It would be a huge discovery if the FBI fed Trump-Russia intel to Steele in the midst of an election, especially when hisÂ ultimate opposition-research clientÂ wasÂ Hillary ClintonÂ and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). The FBI has released only one or two of these reports under FOIA lawsuits and they were 100 percent redacted. The American public deserves better.
2.)Â Â Â The 53 House Intel interviews.Â House Intelligence interviewed many key players in the Russia probe and asked the DNI to declassify those interviews nearly a year ago, after sending the transcripts for review last November. There are several big reveals, Iâ€™m told, including the first evidence that a lawyer tied to the Democratic National Committee had Russia-related contacts at the CIA.
3.)Â Â Â The Stefan Halper documents.Â It has been widely reported that European-based American academic Stefan Halper and a young assistant, Azra Turk,Â worked as FBI sources. We know for sure that one or both had contact with targeted Trump aides like Carter Page andÂ George PapadopoulosÂ at the end of the election. My sources tell me there may be other documents showing Halper continued working his way to the top of Trump’s transition and administration, eventually reaching senior advisers like Peter Navarro inside the White House in summer 2017. These documents would show what intelligence agencies worked with Halper, who directed his activity, how much he was paid and how long his contacts with Trump officials were directed by the U.S. governmentâ€™s Russia probe.
4.)Â Â Â The October 2016 FBI email chain.Â This is a key document identified by Rep. Nunes and his investigators. My sources say it will show exactly what concerns the FBI knew about and discussed with DOJ about using Steeleâ€™s dossier and other evidence to support a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant targeting the Trump campaign in October 2016. If those concerns werenâ€™t shared with FISA judges who approved the warrant, there could be major repercussions.
5.)Â Â Â Page/Papadopoulos exculpatory statements.Â Another of Nunesâ€™ five buckets, these documents purport to show what the two Trump aides were recorded telling undercover assets or captured in intercepts insisting on their innocence. Papadopoulos told me he told an FBI undercover source in September 2016 that the Trump campaign was not trying to obtain hacked Clinton documents from Russia and considered doing so to be treason. If he made that statement with the FBI monitoring, and it was not disclosed to the FISA court, it could be another case of FBI or DOJ misconduct.
6.)Â Â Â The ‘Gang of Eight’ briefing materials.Â These were a series of classified briefings and briefing books the FBI and DOJ provided key leaders in Congress in the summer of 2018 that identify shortcomings in the Russia collusion narrative. Of all the documents congressional leaders were shown, this is most frequently cited to me in private as having changed the minds of lawmakers who werenâ€™t initially convinced of FISA abuses or FBI irregularities.
7.)Â Â Â The Steele spreadsheet.Â IÂ wrote recently that the FBI kept a spreadsheetÂ on the accuracy and reliability of every claim in the Steele dossier. According to my sources, it showed as much as 90 percent of the claims could not be corroborated, were debunked or turned out to be open-source internet rumors. Given Steeleâ€™s own effort to leak intel in his dossier to the media before Election Day, the public deserves to see the FBIâ€™s final analysis of his credibility. AÂ document I reviewed recently showed the FBI described Steeleâ€™s informationÂ as only â€œminimally corroboratedâ€ and the bureauâ€™s confidence in him as â€œmedium.â€
8.)Â Â Â The Steele interview.Â It has beenÂ reported, and confirmed, that the DOJ’s inspector general (IG) interviewed the former British intelligence operativeÂ for as long as 16 hours about his contacts with the FBI while working with Clintonâ€™s opposition research firm, Fusion GPS.Â It is clear from documents already forced into the public viewÂ by lawsuits that Steele admitted in the fall of 2016 that he was desperate to defeat Trump, had a political deadline to make his dirt public, was working for the DNC/Clinton campaign and was leaking to the news media. If he told that to the FBI and it wasnâ€™t disclosed to the FISA court, there could be serious repercussions.
9.)Â Â Â The redacted sections of the third FISA renewal application.Â This was the last of four FISA warrants targeting the Trump campaign; it was renewed in June 2017 after special counselÂ Robert Muellerâ€™s probe had started, and signed by then-Deputy Attorney GeneralÂ Rod Rosenstein. It is the one FISA application that House Republicans have repeatedly asked to be released, and Iâ€™m told the big reveal in theÂ currently redacted sections of the applicationÂ is that it contained both misleading information and evidence of intrusive tactics used by the U.S. government to infiltrate Trumpâ€™s orbit.
10.)Â Â Records of alliesâ€™ assistance.Â Multiple sources have said a handful of U.S. allies overseas â€“Â possibly Great Britain, Australia and Italy â€“ were asked to assist FBI efforts to check on Trump connections to Russia. Members of Congress haveÂ searched recently for some key contact documents with British intelligence. My sources say these documents might help explain Attorney General Bill Barrâ€™sÂ recent commentsÂ thatÂ â€œthe use of foreign intelligence capabilities and counterintelligence capabilities against an AmericanÂ political campaign, to me, is unprecedented and it’s a serious red line that’s been crossed.â€
Though many voters don’t believe, and will never believe, that Democrats and the Obama administration launched the greatest political scandal in the history of our country, a massive document dump of incriminating evidence may be too much for most of them to ignore.
If nothing else, it should convince millions of fence-sitting voters that Trump was indeed victimized by the Obama-led Deep State.
The question is,Â when is the time right?
- The National Sentinel is a Parler media partner. Follow us on the platform by clicking here. Subscribe to ourÂ YouTube channel. Sign up for ourÂ daily headlines newsletter
WHAT DO YOU THINK? COMMENT BELOW