Expensive! Debating Dems collectively call for $200 TRILLION in new spending

(NationalSentinel) If any one of the two-dozen or so Democrats running for their party’s 2020 nomination win the presidency next year and are blessed with a Democrat majority in Congress, you’d better hang onto your wallets and purses.

Because life in America is going to become a lot more expensive.

An analysis by the Washington Free Beacon of promises made by the various candidates during Tuesday’s debates in Detroit found that collective, they promised to spend north of $200 trillion:

Of the 26 declared candidates—including Rep. Eric Swalwell (D., Calif.) who dropped out earlier this month—most have put enormous new government programs front and center in their campaigns. Totaling up these proposals gives taxpaying voters a sense of the budget priorities of the average Democratic candidate.

Of the $210 trillion, the plurality—$94 trillion—is the estimated cost of a Green New Deal, which a number of candidates have backed in some form or another.

The remaining $116 trillion—roughly six times the United States’s annual Gross Domestic Product—is spread across a variety of policy proposals, from Andrew Yang’s Universal Basic Income to Marianne Williamson’s call for $200 to $500 billion in reparations for slavery.

In all, candidates pledged to spend $210 trillion; most proposed new spending of at least $1 trillion at a time when far too many lawmakers in Congress refuse to cut spending at all while our national debt spirals upward, upward, upward.

Of course, candidates didn’t want to spend all of that money up front. Rather, the programs and schemes they propose would be ‘phased in’ over 10 years, but nevertheless become permanent financial fixtures in budgets because, as mentioned, Congress never cuts programs or spending.

Socialist/Communist Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) wins the prize, though, for the most expensive single program: Medicare for All has been estimated to cost something close to $32 trillion over 10 years, though no one believes that estimate is even close (as in, it’s too low).

“Estimates vary, but on top of that, a Sanders administration would add trillions more in infrastructure spending, universal free college, and an ill-defined job guarantee,” the Free Beacon reported.

Where’s all that additional money going to come from? Sanders let the cat out of the bag on that one: Everyone.

Sanders said last month that he’d have to push for a middle-class tax increase in order to fund his socialist spending extravaganza.

Equally disturbing, though, former U.S. Rep. Robert “Beto” O’Rourke said last night that, no, he wouldn’t impose a middle-class tax increase to pay for all of his handouts, meaning ‘the rich’ would be destroyed or he’d print the money to pay for everything, which will lead to hyperinflation. Either way, our economy would tank and take the global economy with it.

“The answer is no,” former Texas Congressman Beto O’Rourke said. “The middle class will not pay more in taxes.”

  • By Jon Dougherty

Follow Jon Dougherty on Parler — the Twitter alternative

Subscribe to our YouTube channel

Subscribe to our Brighteon channel

You Might Like

Leave a Reply


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Notify of
%d bloggers like this: