By Jon Dougherty
(NationalSentinel) Attorney General William Barr said in an interview withÂ The Associated Press published on Tuesday that he supports POTUS Donald Trump’s contention that the U.S. Supreme Court was wrong when a majority of justices failed to support the administration’s efforts to put a question about citizenship on the 2020 Census.
Furthermore, the AP reported, Barr said he plans to take action in the coming days regarding the addition of the question on the 2020 Census, but he strategically declined to discuss what actions were being considered.
The AP noted:
…Barr said the Trump administration will take action in the coming days that he believes will allow the government to add the controversial census query. Barr would not detail the plans, though a senior official said President Donald Trump is expected to issue a memorandum to the Commerce Department instructing it to include the question on census forms.
But in addition to that, it appears as though the AG has also replaced the entire legal staff that was working on the issue after they failed to convince justices of its constitutionality.
The AP noted further:
The new team, named in court papers, includes Deputy Assistant Attorney General David Morrell, a former Trump White House lawyer and law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas; Christopher Bates, who previously worked for Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, and four career Justice Department attorneys, Glenn Girdharry, Colin Kisor, Christopher Reimer and Daniel Schiffer.
James Burnham, a top lawyer in the departmentâ€™s civil division who had been leading the team, had told Barr that a number of people who had been litigating the case preferred â€œnot to continue during this new phase,â€ the attorney general said.
The new team may find it easier to argue the administrationâ€™s new position, said an administration official, speaking only on condition of anonymity because the official was not authorized to comment for attribution.
Barr said he didnâ€™t have details on why the attorneys didnâ€™t want to continue, but â€œas far as I know, they donâ€™t think we are legally wrong.â€
As for POTUS Trump’s opinion that the high court got its 5-4 ruling wrong — with Chief Justice John Roberts writing not that the question is unconstitutional but only that the administration did not properly justify asking it — Barr said he agrees.
“I agree with him that the Supreme Court decision was wrong,â€ the attorney general said, adding that he believes there is â€œan opportunity potentially to cure the lack of clarity that was the problem and we might as well take a shot at doing that.â€
Several legal and constitutional analysts did not agree with Roberts, noting that the high court’s only function was to decide whether or not asking a question about citizenship is constitutional — and clear, the SCOTUS didn’t rule that it isÂ not constitutional.
In fact, the larger issue is why all references to citizenship were removed in 2010 by the Obama administration, they argue, since the question had been asked in some form or another for the vast majority of our country’s history.
Conservative talk radio behemoth Rush Limbaugh addressed this aspect of the citizenship question Monday on his program:
You know the real question here? Who took the citizenship question off the census and why? Thatâ€™s the question. The idea that itâ€™s controversial to put it back on, wrongo!
And Iâ€™ll tell you who took it off. Barack Hussein O eliminated the citizenship question from the census. And the real pregunta is why? Well, we all know the â€œwhy.â€ The left is doing everything it can to increase the census by including illegal aliens in it. And if you put a citizenship question on there, you might depress or suppress the participation of the illegals. And the Democrats demand and require that the illegals participate in this. They want as many unproductive, dependent souls as they can get supposedly living legally in the United States.
The census to them is simply a vehicle for the distribution of wealth. And they also, of course, want to use it to help in the drawing of congressional districts and this kind of thing. But itâ€™s really primarily about money.Â
- Follow Jon Dougherty onÂ Parler â€” the Twitter alternative
Subscribe to ourÂ YouTube channel
Subscribe to ourÂ Brighteon channel
Sign up for ourÂ daily headlines newsletter
We’ve reduced the number of ads on our site to enhance the reader experience. Please support us by patronizing our remaining advertisers. Thanks!