By Jon Dougherty
In a letter to Attorney General William Barr, Senate Finance Committee chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Chairman Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) are imploring him to examine and deal with any “improper” surveillance by the FBI during the 2016 presidential campaign and beyond.
In particular, the GOP senators are raising concerns about revelations that fired FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok and his one-time paramour, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page, were attempting to cultivate informants within the incoming Trump administration who would spy on the president and his team and then report back.
“During your April 10, 2019, testimony before a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee, you stated that you are looking into the ‘genesis and conduct of intelligence activities directed at the Trump campaign during 2016.’ You further stated that ‘spying did occur,’ and that you believe it is your obligation to look into the question of whether surveillance activities by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) or other intelligence agencies were adequately predicated,”Â the letterÂ says. “We share your concerns about these activities, and are troubled by the apparent unauthorized disclosures of surveillance efforts and other classified information during the same time period.”
“First, in the course of our oversight work we have reviewed certain text messages that may show potential attempts by the FBI to conduct surveillance of President-elect Trumpâ€™s transition team,” the letter continues.
“In text messages exchanged between former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and former FBI Attorney Lisa Page, the two discussed the possibility of developing â€œpotential relationshipsâ€ at a November 2016 FBI briefing for presidential transition team staff.
“Specifically, it appears they discussed sending ‘the CI guy’ to assess an unnamed person(s) ‘demeanor’ but were concerned because it might be unusual for him to attend. Â A few weeks after the presidential election, Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page discussed the logistics for the briefing,” Grassley and Johnson wrote.
“The nature of these communications, and the precise purpose of any attempts to ‘develop relationships’ with Trump or Pence transition team staff are not immediately clear. Â Were these efforts done to gain better communication between the respective parties, or were the briefings used as intelligence gathering operations?” they asked.
“Further, did any such surveillance activities continue beyond the inauguration, and in the event they did, were those activities subject to proper predication? Â Any improper FBI surveillance activities that were conducted before or after the 2016 election must be brought to light and properly addressed.”
Grassley and Johnson requested theyÂ be briefed with answers to the following questions before May 9:
1. Please describe the nature and extent of your review of FBI surveillance of the Trump Campaign, President-elect Trumpâ€™s transition staff, Vice President-elect Penceâ€™s transition staff, President Trumpâ€™s staff, and Vice President Penceâ€™s staff, including your efforts to determine whether that surveillance was adequately predicated. Â Â Â Â Â
2. How many counter-intelligence briefings were provided to the Trump and Pence transition staffs prior to Inauguration Day? Â Please list the dates, all agencies involved, and each official that represented those agencies at the briefings. Â Â Â
3. Many of the FBI employees involved in these activities are no longer employed by the federal government. How will your review obtain information needed from these individuals?
4. Will you commit to providing the results of your review once completed?
5. What steps have you taken to investigate whether DOJ or FBI officials had unauthorized contacts with the media during the Russia investigation?
In addition, the two Republicans want Barr to investigate leaks of sensitive data and information from the bureau to certain media outlets. Specifically, they are asking the AG to find out if meetings between the FBI and the incoming Trump team were used to gather dirt for various news organizations.
“The Justice Department Inspector Generalâ€™s review of the Clinton investigation found ‘profound concerns about the volume and extent of unauthorized media contacts by FBI personnel.’ It appears the same happened during the Russia investigation,” they wrote.
“Leaks to the media about ongoing investigations undermine the ability of investigators to properly investigate. Moreover, sensitive leaks to the media while members of Congress performing constitutionally mandated oversight are kept in the dark is unacceptable,” the letter says.
“We note that a number of news outlets have reported sensitive information related to the investigation into alleged Russian collusion with the Trump campaign,” it continues. “Those reports have revealed sensitive information focusing on the FBI sending informants to meet with Trump advisors; a warrant to surveil Carter Page; and the United Kingdom signal intelligence agency briefing former CIA Director John Brennan on alleged communications between Trumpâ€™s campaign and Russian officials, among other things.”
The letter comes on the heels of reports that the Trump White House, along with the DoJ inspector general’s office, is preparing to go after deep state figures involved in the Spygate plot to depose him.
- Follow Jon Dougherty on Twitter at @JonDougherty10