By J. D. Heyes
Former Vice President Joe Biden has been creeping out Americans with his handsy, innuendo-ridden physical behavior around women and young girls for decades, but only now has his behavior become an â€œissue.â€
As the former veep gears up for a potential 2020 presidential bid of his own, a story broke last week that broke wide open the wide-open â€œsecretâ€ in D.C. regarding Bidenâ€™s sexual creepiness, told in the first person by Lucy Flores, who ran unsuccessfully for lieutenant governor of Nevada in 2014.
Flores claims that right before she was scheduled to take the stage at a campaign event she appeared at with him, the then-VP sidled up behind herÂ real close, leaned in, took a big whiff of her (unwashed) hair and slowly planted a lingering kiss atop her head.
All of which made her feel angry, shocked, andâ€¦creeped out.
Since Flores told her storyÂ a second womanÂ has come forward,Â CNNÂ no doubt begrudgingly reported: Amy Lappos told theÂ Hartford (Connecticut) CourantÂ newspaper (Bidenâ€™s from Connecticut) that the veep touched her inappropriately as well.
If you do an Internet search for â€œJoe Biden creepy videosâ€ youâ€™re going to find a lot of them. WhyÂ itâ€™s suddenly an issueÂ is already political fodder; maybe â€œsomeoneâ€ in the Democratic establishment doesnâ€™t want an old white guy to be the face of the party in 2020 (so look for Crazy Bernie to be sandbagged next, if this is true).
But there is another reason why Biden cannot and should not be placed at the pinnacle of American power: He may also be corrupt.
â€™Youâ€™re not getting the billionâ€™
According to ace investigative reporter John Solomon,Â writing atÂ The Hill, Bidenâ€™s perhaps/maybe 2020 presidential campaign may be over before it starts, and not just because his legendary creepiness is coming home to roost.
Solomon notes that earlier this year, Biden â€“ speaking during a Council on Foreign Relations event â€“Â couldnâ€™t help bragging about how he effectively threatened the Ukrainian president, Petro Poroshenko, in 2016 that he would see to it the U.S. withheld $1 billion in American loan guarantees, which would have bankrupted Kiev, if he didnâ€™t fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin immediately.
â€œI said, â€˜Youâ€™re not getting the billion.â€™ Iâ€™m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: â€˜Iâ€™m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, youâ€™re not getting the money,â€™â€ Biden says he told Poroshenko.
â€œWell, son of a bitch, he got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the timeâ€ â€“ which is diplomatic speak for â€œsomeone the Obama administration favored.â€ He even implicated the former president in the exchange.
Solomon noted further:
Interviews with a half-dozen senior Ukrainian officials confirm Bidenâ€™s account, though they claim the pressure was applied over several months in late 2015 and early 2016, not just six hours of one dramatic day. Whatever the case, Poroshenko and Ukraineâ€™s parliament obliged by ending Shokinâ€™s tenure as prosecutor. Shokin was facing steep criticism in Ukraine, and among some U.S. officials, for not bringing enough corruption prosecutions when he was fired.
In subsequent interviews with Ukrainian officials, however, they related something to Solomon they say Biden no doubt knew when he issued his ultimatum: The prosecutor who was fired was leading a far-reaching corruption probe into Burisma Holdings, a natural gas firm that just happened to employ Bidenâ€™s son, Hunter, as a board member.
Solomon noted that, according to banking records, Rosemont Seneca Partners LLC, Hunter Bidenâ€™s U.S. firm, â€œreceived regular transfers into one of its accounts â€“ usually more than $166,000 a month â€“ from Burisma from spring 2014 through fall 2015, during a period when Vice President Biden was the main U.S. official dealing with Ukraine and its tense relations with Russia.â€
The general prosecutorâ€™s file on the probe shows that officials with the office had already identified Hunter Biden, business partner Devon Archer, and their firm, Rosemont Seneca, as likely recipients of the money.
In written answers, Shokin told Solomon that he was widening his investigation to include interrogations of members of Burisma board â€“ including Hunter Biden.
Former VP Biden never mentioned any of this in his braggadocio discussion at the CFR seminar, but Solomon says that U.S. and Ukrainian authorities said Biden and his office certainly knew of the general prosecutorâ€™s investigation.
â€” Hunter Bidenâ€™s appointment to the board was widely reported in the U.S.;
â€” The U.S. Embassy located in Kiev which coordinated Bidenâ€™s in-country work discussed the prosecutorâ€™s case against Burisma often and publicly;
â€” Great Britain took well-publicized actions against Burisma while VP Biden was involved in the Ukraine-Russia mess;
â€” Bidenâ€™s office was quoted on the record, noting Hunter Bidenâ€™s appointment to and role on Burismaâ€™s board, stating that as a private citizen and lawyer, he was free to pursue his own private business deals.
The investigation stopped cold after Shokin was fired. But though Shokin was out his replacement â€“ the man VP Biden hailed as â€œsolidâ€ â€“ Yuriy Lutsenko â€“ began looking into the funny money that was changing hands and allegedly streaming into the account of Hunter Biden after rumors began to swirl that his dad was considering a 2020 presidential run.
And now, after finding similarities between his own review of the case file and Sokinâ€™s original findings, Lutsenko told Solomon that heâ€™d like to present what he has to POTUS Trumpâ€™s new attorney general, William Barr. And he would particularly like to highlight the former Veepâ€™s intervention.
On Wednesday, author Peter Schweizer, head of the Government Accountability Institute andÂ Breitbart News‘ senior editor-at-large, said that Hunter Biden received millions of dollars while his veep father directed $1.8 billion in aid to Ukraine.
â€œI think a deeper problem that [Joe Biden] faces is â€” as has been reported onÂ BreitbartÂ and reported atÂ The Hill, today â€” which I think is far deeper is the fact that his family, particularly his son, cashed in while he was vice president of the United States,” he told the news site’s SiriusXM radio program.
“Weâ€™ve talked before about theÂ deals he procuredÂ with the government for China,â€ remembered Schweizer. â€œThe other place [Joe Bidenâ€™s] son, Hunter Biden, procured a big deal was in Ukraine. In Ukraine, it involved an energy company called Burisma, which is a very corrupt organization headed by an oligarch named Mykola Zlochevsky who is very close to Viktor Yanukovich, the pro-Russian leader.â€
Schweizer then asked: â€œThereâ€™s all kinds of questions and implications. Is there a Russian component to this, because Burisma is such a corrupt company?â€
â€œThe bottom line is Joe Biden was the Obama administrationâ€™s point-person on policy towards Ukraine,â€ noted Schweizer. â€œHe steered $1.8 billion in aid to that government and while he was doing so, his son got a sweetheart deal with this energy company â€“ that weâ€™ve been able to trace over just a 14-month period â€“ paid $3.1 million into an account where Hunter Biden was getting paid.â€
The editor-at-large also pushed back against any allegations that POTUS Donald Trump ‘colluded’ with Russia. If anything, he says, it was the Bidens and the Clintons conspiring with foreign governments, Russia included.
â€œThere is far more evidence of collusion involving Joe Biden â€” or even involving the Clintons â€” of collusion with these foreign powers than there was with Donald Trump, because you actually have the transaction of money, you have very favorable policies that were carried out. I think â€˜collusionâ€™ is not too strong a word. I think itâ€™s a pretty accurate word,” he said.
Schweizer added, â€œThereâ€™s no question. The Bidens got a lot of money â€” millions of dollars â€” from these foreign powers. Hunter Biden had no legitimate reasons to get the deal. He simply wasnâ€™t qualified.â€
In all, Solomon adds, Ukrainian officials believe some $3 million made it into the accounts of Hunter Biden and Archer, his partner. And while everyone is innocent until proven guilty, Joe Biden needs to answer some hard questions about this if he decides to run.
That is — if he even makes it past the â€œcreeperâ€ part.
The National Sentinel contributed to this report.Â
Republished in part from NewsTarget.