By Jon Dougherty

Are the wheels finally coming off the Spygate scandal? Are the co-conspirators getting nervous not just about being found out but about suffering legal consequences?

Could be. And frankly, it’s about time.

Within days after special counsel Robert Mueller filed his report with the Justice Department noting that he’d found no “collusion” between the 2016 Trump campaign and Mother Russia, the House Intelligence Committee’s ranking member, Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) indicated he and others were preparing to file criminal referrals to DoJ regarding individuals Mueller “skipped over” during his 18-month probe.

“We’re still continuing to get to the bottom of what was happening to the Department of Justice and the FBI, trying to make sure that everyone there is held accountable…either through the courts or otherwise…. We’ll be making criminal referrals on a whole host of topics, most importantly probably lying and misleading Congress,” Nunes told One American News Network earlier this month, as we reported.

Well, we’ve heard these kinds of things before, only to be disappointed in the long run when nothing came of them. But there are indications that this time might be different.

First of all, looking back it made sense for the president to allow the Mueller witch hunt to play out. After all, he knew (as did most rational Americans), that the “collusion” narrative was a hoax. Mueller finally had to admit it.

Secondly, there are indications that some of the roaches involved in the scandal from the outset are scrambling to get out of the light. Enter former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper.

Last week during a post-Mueller report appearance on his meal ticket network, CNN, Clapper once again attempted to pin the blame on Obama for ordering the Spygate probe.

As noted by Right Red Videos:

ANDERSON COOPER, CNN HOST: The 2017 assessment that the President says he now agrees with, that was done while you and then NCI Director John Brennan were still in office. So, how can we reconcile the President attacking you, but apparently after a very long time finally, allegedly saying — or saying he allegedly agrees with the product of the intelligence community that you, yourself oversaw?

JAMES CLAPPER: Yes, well, this is — yes, as we’ve come to know the President, he is not a stalwart for a consistency or coherence. So it’s very hard to explain that. One point I’d like to make, Anderson, that I don’t think has come up very much before, and I’m alluding now to the President’s criticism of President Obama for all that he did or didn’t do before he left office with respect to the Russian meddling. If it weren’t for President Obama, we might not have done the intelligence community assessment that we did that set off a whole sequence of events which are still unfolding today, notably, special counsel Mueller’s investigation.

President Obama is responsible for that, and it was he who tasked us to do that intelligence community assessment in the first place. I think it’s an important point when it comes to critiquing President Obama.

This is inconsistent with what Clapper said in May 2018, when he denied that Obama knew anything about a key component of Spygate, which is, the placement of spies in the Trump campaign, as we reported:

“I am sure President Obama had no knowledge whatsoever of an informant,” Clapper said, adding that the FBI has many informants who play various roles within the department “who provide very valuable information and do so in a legitimate way.”

This came after former White House spokesman Ari Fleischer, who worked for President George W. Bush, said he was positive Obama was fully aware of the Deep State’s criminal spy operation. There’s no way Obama wouldn’t have known, Fleischer insisted. In fact, he said, Obama authorized it. He would have had to.

Clapper would then go on to change his story. In July 2018, Clapper said essentially the same thing on CNN that he said this week, as we noted:

You Might Like

If it weren’t for President Obama we might not have done the intelligence community assessment that we did that set up a whole sequence of events which are still unfolding today including Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation.  President Obama is responsible for that.  It was he who tasked us to do that intelligence community assessment in the first place.

It’s interesting that Clapper would implicate his former boss again now. Last year, he was able to frame the admission in positive terms — ‘Hey, Obama ordered this because he was legitimately concerned about Russian collusion!’ — but to say the same thing this week after Mueller was forced to report “no collusion” carries a far different connotation.

Why would Clapper implicate Obama anew after the hoax was exposed? Because maybe — just maybe — this time, Nunes’ claims that criminal referrals are coming is real.

And timing is everything, considering Mueller’s findings.

Be the first to receive our latest video reports: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel by clicking here and pro-liberty video platform Brighteon by clicking here

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x