The Latest:

Gun rights groups pan AG nominee Barr: ‘We don’t need another enemy’

There is a reason why William Barr, who is POTUS Donald Trump’s pick to become the next attorney general, is a favorite among the establishment crowd in Washington, D.C., and it likely has less to do with his legal credentials than his policy credentials: He’s not a big supporter of the founders’ vision of the Second Amendment.

At least, that’s what a number of gun rights organizations are saying.

In a letter to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), the Firearms Policy Coalition said it was opposed to Barr’s confirmation as Attorney General on the grounds that he has previously voiced support for Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPO), or what are commonly referred to as “red flag laws,” as well as his opinion that “there is room for reasonable regulation” of gun rights under the Constitution.

That’s troubling because the language of the Second Amendment makes it clear that government has no authority to regulate firearms in the first place: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

The “well-regulated militia” part has been adequately carried out. Militias were formed as early as 1636 with the first arrival of colonists from Britain; they were formalized as the National Guard under the Militia Act of 1903.

But the “shall not be infringed” part of the Second Amendment has been routinely ignored by local, state, and federal lawmakers dating back to the National Firearms Act of 1938, which imposed federal licensing requirements one gun makers, gun importers, and retail gun sellers (the birth of the ‘FFL’ — Federal Firearms License). No other amendment requires Americans to get government permission in the form of a license in order to enjoy its protections.

As such, the coalition wants Barr’s confirmation to fail. As reported by Townhall, gun groups are specifically opposed to something Barr said win 1991 during his confirmation hearings to become President George H. W. Bush’s AG.

At one point, Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.) asked Barr what he thought about legislation (the Brady Bill) requiring a five-day waiting period before purchasing a handgun and a background check, as well as the “DeConcini Amendment” (named after then-U.S. Sen. Dennis DeConcini, D-Ariz.), which sought to ban the sale of so-called “assault weapons” for a period of time. Barr said he would “support” both of those provisions provided they were attached to a “broader” crime bill that included stricter law enforcement penalties.

“This is a strong indicator that Mr. Barr, if confirmed, would not only maintain the DOJ’s troubling current litigation positions, but potentially even direct United States Attorneys and DOJ civil litigation counsel across the nation to take even more aggressively anti-rights, authoritarian positions in a wide variety of prosecutions and constitutional challenges. That is not the proper remedy for centuries of constitutional resistance and atrophy,” the coalition said in its letter to McConnell.

“We believe that the views expressed by Mr. Barr disqualify him from serving as the Nation’s highest law enforcement officer. The Constitution, the People of the United States, and law-abiding gun owners do not need another enemy.”

These views were also expressed by another pro-Second Amendment group, Gun Owners of America. The organization sent out an action alert to gun owners around the country and encouraged them to call their senators to let them know they oppose Barr’s appointment on those grounds.

“…[W]hen Barr openly spat on the right to keep and bear arms on Tuesday — and threatened to break down our doors in the middle of the night in order to confiscate our guns — well, that’s a problem for us,” GOA’s Executive Director, Erich Pratt, said in the alert. — J. D. Heyes

A version of this story first appeared at NewsTarget.

Never miss a story! Sign up for our daily email newsletter — Click here!


8 Comments on Gun rights groups pan AG nominee Barr: ‘We don’t need another enemy’

  1. Yes, there seems to be something wrong with this guy, Muller’s best friend?

  2. Robert Moran // January 21, 2022 at 12:02 pm // Reply

    The president said he had lunch with NRA leaders last week and told the governors in attendance that it’s “OK” to “fight” the Second Amendment advocacy group once in a while.
    “And you know what, if they’re not with you, we have to fight them every once in a while. That’s OK. They’re doing what they think is right.”

    • Daniel Ciammaichella // January 21, 2022 at 2:50 pm // Reply

      I fight the NRA all the time…because they are just like Trump and Barr…way too willing to compromise on our rights that they have no standing to compromise.

      • Leo Smith // January 21, 2022 at 3:24 pm //

        You are an IDIOT. You need to learn the alphabet before you try spelling big words.I am the NRA. What do you have to accuse me of? Hope I don’t get offended by it. But you would have to be a human to offend me.By your thoughts. You ain”t a human, Leftist liberal at best.

  3. Josh Michael // January 21, 2022 at 5:57 pm // Reply

    The 2nd A protects you from being Soros”s butt buddy…asshole!

  4. Jerry Warrington // January 21, 2022 at 6:33 pm // Reply

    Barr’s friendship with Mueller, his views of the second amendment and his support for the sniper killer of Ruby Ridge’s, Weaver’s wife with babe in arms for Weaver selling a shotgun that had a 2″ too short a barrel, disqualifies him as a conservative candidate. I am all for Trump but I am against Barr’s confirmation.

  5. Beth McLaurine // January 21, 2022 at 6:44 pm // Reply

    We have bigger fish to fry. Barr seems intent on prosecuting the FBI-DOJ misconduct. There is no way Trump is going to let him piss off his base by getting side-lined into 2nd amendment issues. That was a GH Bush thing. RELAX.

  6. White ‘privilege’: Forced mass immigration, so-called anti racism, and “diversity” for ONLY white people!

    If diversity is such a strength, why is this “gift” given to White populations only, when there are so many non white places that “need” it much more?

    its Anti White
    its Geno cide

Have something to say?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: