(National Sentinel)Â Injustice:Â The longer Democrats are able to stall the official outcome of the not-so-close-on-election-night results in two key Florida races, the more likely they are to steal the victories from Republican candidates.
That’s their strategy, anyway, and they keep getting assistance from the judicial activists posing as federal judges that Barack Obama nominated to the federal bench.
U.S. District Judge Mark Walker — appointed by Obama in 2012 and confirmed by a Democrat-controlled Senate — sided with Democrats Thursday morning over the issue of fixing ballot signatures, despite the fact that his ruling is a clear violation ofÂ Florida election law (10th Amendment, anyone?).
CBS MiamiÂ reported:
Siding with U.S. Sen. Bill Nelsonâ€™s campaign and national Democrats, a federal judge early Thursday gave voters until 5 p.m. Saturday to fix ballots that were rejected because of mismatched signatures.
U.S. District Judge Mark Walkerâ€™s ruling came hours before a 3 p.m. Thursday deadline for a machine recount to be completed in the U.S. Senate race between Nelson and Republican Gov. Rick Scott, whose 56,000-vote election-night lead had dwindled to fewer than 13,000 votes when the recount was ordered.
The lawsuit focuses on part of Florida law that requires signatures on mail-in and provisional ballots to match signatures on file with elections offices. Voters whose ballots are delivered by 5 p.m. the day before an election have the opportunity to â€œcureâ€ signature mismatches. But people whose mail-in ballots are received after that, or voters who cast provisional ballots on Election Day, do not.
â€œThe precise issue, in this case, is whether Floridaâ€™s law that allows county election officials to reject vote-by-mail and provisional ballots for mismatched signatures â€” with no standards, an illusory process to cure, and no process to challenge the rejection â€” passes constitutional muster. The answer is simple. It does not,â€ Walker wrote in a 34-page order.
And yet,Â before this election, the law passed constitutional muster. Hmmmm.
Mind you,Â federal prosecutors have already uncovered
vote fraud vote irregularities, as Politico reportedÂ Wednesday:
The Florida Department of State last week asked federal prosecutors to investigate dates that were changed on official state election documents, the first voting â€œirregularitiesâ€ it has flagged in the wake of the 2018 elections.
The concerns, which the department says can be tied to the Florida Democratic Party, center around date changes on forms used to fix vote-by-mail ballots sent with incorrect or missing information. Known as â€œcure affidavits,â€ those documents used to fix mail ballots were due no later than 5 p.m. on Nov. 5 â€” the day before the election. But affidavits released on Tuesday by the DOS show that documents from four different counties said the ballots could be returned by 5 p.m. on Thursday, which is not accurate.
Among the counties in question is Broward, which emerged as the epicenter of controversy as three statewide races and three local legislative races went into recounts following the Nov. 6 elections. Republicans have pointed to embattled Broward Elections chief Brenda Snipes’ record of past election gaffes in arguing that the largely Democratic country is tilted against them â€” perhaps fraudulently so.
Never miss a story! Sign up for our daily email newsletter â€”Â Click here!