The Latest:

Judicial Watch files ethics complaint against Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers

(TNSDishonest: Government accountability watchdog Judicial Watch said Friday the organization has filed an ethics complaint against the lawyers for Christine Blasey Ford, who accused — without corroboration — Justice Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault stemming from an alleged incident 35-plus years ago.

“Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a complaint to the Board of Professional Responsibility of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals of Debra S. Katz, Lisa J. Banks, and Michael R. Bromwich for violating the rules of professional responsibility in their representation of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee during the hearings on the nomination of the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh,” the organization announced on its website.

The complaint says that “by not informing their client Dr. Ford that Sen. Chuck Grassley, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee offered in a letter to ‘fly female staff investigators to meet Dr. Ford… in California, or anywhere else, to obtain (her) testimony,’ Katz, Banks, and Bromwich violated the following District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct,” said the JW announcement.

Specifically, the complaint alleges violations of:

Rule l.4(a) – A lawyer shall keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and promptly comply with reasonable requests for information.

Rule 1.4(b) – A lawyer shall explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation.

“On September 21, 2018, Chairman Grassley wrote another letter to Ms. Katz, where he stated that “[t]he Chairman has offered the ability for Dr. Ford to testify in an open session, a closed session, a public staff interview, and a private staff interview,” said JW. The Chairman is even willing to fly female staff investigators to meet Dr. Ford and you in California, or anywhere else, to obtain Dr. Ford’s testimony [emphasis added].”

But during her testimony September 27, however, Ford indicated that she had hoped the committee would come to her in California — meaning she was never informed the offer was made.

During her testimony, she was asked by special prosecutor Rachel Mitchell about McConnell’s offer, but her attorneys would not allow her to answer directly.

“…I was willing – I was hoping that they would come to me, but then I realized that was an unrealistic request,” she said.

Mitchell asked at one point, “Was it communicated to you by your counsel or someone else, that the committee had asked to interview you and that – that they offered to come out to California to do so?”

After being counseled off-mic by her lawyers, Ford said she appreciated the offer, adding, “I wasn’t clear on what the offer was. If you were going to come out to see me, I would have happily hosted you and had you – had been happy to speak with you out there. I just did not – it wasn’t clear to me that that was the case.“

That is more evidence that she was not informed by her counsel of the offer.

“Thus, it is clear, by Dr. Ford’s own testimony, that her attorneys did not communicate the Committee’s multiple offers to take her testimony in California, despite the fact that this was Dr. Ford’s preferred option. In fact, Dr. Ford testified that she ‘wasn’t clear on what the offer was’ and regarded the possibility of investigators taking her testimony in California as ‘unrealistic’ — when in fact it had been specifically offered,” JW’s announcement said.

Never miss a story! Sign up for our daily email newsletter — Click here!


4 Comments on Judicial Watch files ethics complaint against Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers

  1. Chrissy Ford’s attorneys should lose their licenses to practice law for apparently failing to inform their client about the Senate committee offer. Lawyers are not above the law.

  2. Remember those liars and fake heroes Grassley & McConnell? They loudly proclaimed their heroism and called for investigations. They are not investigating Feinstein or the perjury. They are not demanding the DOJ act. But, they continue to investigate Trump.

  3. Mr. V. Lombardi, please parse your comment - are you accusing Messrs Grassley and McConnell of being liars? Are you suggesting that the two Senators are investigating Pres. Trump? Or is your question to the Senators: “remember those liars and….?” A properly placed comma might have done the clarifying trick.

    As they say, there is a difference between “Uncle Jack, off the horse!” and “Uncle, jack off the horse.”

  4. They did tell her, and she committed perjury when she said they didn’t. It will be fun to see how this plays out. Lawyers defend themselves and throw her under the bus, or take the ethics violation hit to protect her from the perjury charge. I love Judicial Watch 🙂

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. Judicial Watch files ethics complaint against Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers | The Olive Branch Report

Have something to say?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: