(National Sentinel)Â Take them all: On Sunday, Sen. Rand Paul, Kentucky Republican, said he was going to suggest to POTUS Donald Trump that he strip security clearances from Deep State Obama sycophants like John Brennan and James Clapper.
The former CIA chief and Director of National Intelligence are likely “monetizing” their clearances as hired analysts on two of the most Left-wing “news” networks in existence.
Plus, they’ve been very frequent critics of the president, which led Paul to believe they may be using their access to top-level finished intelligence products in a way that undermines POTUS.
Is John Brennan monetizing his security clearance? Is John Brennan making millions of dollars divulging secrets to the mainstream media with his attacks on @realDonaldTrump ?
— Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) July 23, 2018
The perpetually angry Left melted down when the White House later confirmed that POTUS Trump was indeed considering revoking not just the security clearances of Brennan and Clapper, but others including former FBI Director James Comey; former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe; former National Security Adviser Susan Rice and former CIA Director Michael Hayden (who also worked under President George W. Bush).
But there’s one name missing from that list:Â Hillary Clinton.
Two former special operations officers areÂ wondering whyÂ she hasn’t been added to the list.
The Daily Caller reported:
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was not named in the White Houseâ€™s Monday announcement that it was considering revoking six former national security officialsâ€™ security clearances, a 33-year special forces veteran noticed.
â€œFrankly, I was shocked that Hillary, the chief culprit, was omitted,â€Â retired Col. James Williamson told The Daily Caller News Foundation. Williamson, who was in special operations for 30 years and has held a top-level security since 1982, is president of OPSEC,Â a nonpartisan organization representing retired special forces and intelligence community officials.
â€œThere is more than ample evidence that Hillary Clinton committed, whether its gross negligence, or,Â as [former FBI Director James] Comey would like to say, extreme carelessness,â€ Williamson told TheDCNF. â€œJust from the documented evidence, there was enough to prosecute.Â If thereâ€™s evidence to prosecute, then thereâ€™s certainly grounds to pull somebodyâ€™s clearance.â€
OPSEC Vice PresidentÂ retired Col. James Waurishuk agreed.
Clinton â€œmoved classified information from the State Department to a private server,â€ Waurishuk, who served on the National Security Council and on the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told TheDCNF. â€œHer clearance should have been immediately revoked and proper action taken to have her removed. She still carries that crime.â€
â€œShe was a risk,â€ he continued. â€œThat is one of the things you look at. Is this person a risk? And yes, she was a risk. From that standpoint, she should have her clearance revoked.â€
The organization has been largely supportive of Â Trumpâ€™s foreign and military policies.
Hillary Clinton trafficked in classified information. She should have been charged and convicted on multiple counts of mishandling classified information.
She should be wearing prison gray right now, notÂ this disgusting garment while still breathing free air.
And she would have been, had James Comey, Loretta Lynch, Barack Obama and the other Deep State thugs not thrown the investigation in the hopes some of them would be working for her as president.
Revoke them all!