(National Sentinel)Â World War III:Â As the modern day â€œmilitary-industrial complexâ€ was being built during the early stages of the Cold War, President Dwight D. Eisenhower was said to be pessimistic about advance planning for any nuclear exchange with what was then the Soviet Union.
â€œIn preparing for battle I have always found that plans are useless, but planning is indispensable,â€ World War IIâ€™s Supreme Allied Commander and five-star general once said.
The point is well-taken: Even the best-laid plans can fall apart in moments, but if you donâ€™t make them, you wonâ€™t even have resources to deal with emergencies when they occur, let alone the people to carry them out.
That said, the U.S. government continues to update plans begun during the George W. Bush administration for a nuclear attack on the country while simultaneously rehearsing responses.Â
As reported byÂ The Daily StarÂ in the U.K., government planners believe the three most likely cities that would be targeted with a nuclear device are Washington, D.C., New York City, and Los Angeles â€” the two largest cities in the country as well as the most important one, in terms of governance.
Part of the plan, called â€œNational Response Scenario Number One,â€ involves sending in U.S. military forces in a search-and-rescue mode that will also very likely include a security mission.Â
Disaster planners are war-gaming a nuclear explosion equal to 10,000 tons of TNT that would lead to a 3,000-square-mile quarantine, mass evacuations, overwhelming numbers of casualties, and a national (and probably global) recession.
The paper noted in online editions:
Predictions were sketched out based on a device being detonated within Washington by terrorists rather than a nuclear strike in World War 3.
The possible scenario for a nuclear attack was deemed to be an improvised bomb driving into the city centre in a delivery van.
Authorities believe a nuclear explosion in the center of Washington, D.C., especially on a typical work day, would kill â€œhundreds of thousandsâ€ of people, according to Department of Homeland Security documents seen byÂ The Daily Star.
The explosion would create a massive radioactive plume that would spread across the region before drifting out over the Atlantic Ocean. The blast will likely be felt as far away as 150 miles, authorities believe.
In addition to the explosion and fallout â€” which would be bad enough â€” planners say that the accompanying electromagnetic pulse (EMP) wouldÂ knock out power and fry electronicsÂ in vehicles, businesses, the financial sector and industry for miles around. The â€œhigh voltage spikeâ€ would create additional problems for about three miles from ground zero. In addition to power grids, cell phone towers and switching states would also be â€œvulnerable.â€
Those who responded first are also expected to receive â€œlethal doses of radiation,â€ according to the DHS document. Their â€œvalueâ€ will have to be measured against whether theyâ€™ll be allowed into the danger zone, which means there is the potential that scores of people near the detonation site â€” if theyâ€™re still alive â€” will be left to their own devices.
Included in the planning document is a table that lists the most common injuries and wounds that responders will see from the blast. They include radiation poisoning, of course, but also flash blindness, burns to the eye and blunt trauma among wounded survivors, which is expected to be even higher than the number of dead.
Planners also warn that there will be a â€œsignificant psychological impact on survivorsâ€ which will impact rescuers and that costs from such an attack will be in the â€œbillions of dollars.â€
Clean-up will take â€œyears,â€ the document says, while the attack would â€œforever change the American psyche.â€
Whatâ€™s more, there will likely be a permanent impact on our way of life. â€œThere will certainly be economic, political, law enforcement, civil liberty and military consequences that will likely change the very nature of the country,â€ it says.
A version of this story first appeared at NewsTarget.
Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readerâ€™s newsfeed and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share with your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Also, if you like this content, you will never miss a story when youÂ subscribe to our daily newsletter.