(National Sentinel)Â Media Matters: A columnist for theÂ Washington Examiner has taken the so-called ‘mainstream media’ to task for its warped, overtly biased coverage of today’s top political figures, noting that most are no longer “journalists” but really are just “activists.”
“The Washington Post, New York Times, and USA Today still refuse to employ a single columnist that wonâ€™t begin each piece with anything less than,Â ‘Mr. Trump, you are a liar!’ wrote Eddie Scarry in December.
He noted that in his view, the only major “mainstream” newspaper that provides “anything that even looks sort of like a reasonable perspective on the still-young White House” isÂ The Wall Street Journal opinion page.
Scarry noted further:
CNN this year had to retract one story and significantly modify a second one (both were related to Trump and Russia) after it turned out the former wasnâ€™t supported by any facts (otherwise often referred to as â€œfictionâ€) and the latter was inaccurate to the point of libel.
Brian Ross, with his apparent lifetime tenure at ABC News, was suspended in early December after he once again reported catastrophically wrong information about Trump and, of course, Russia.
And as if on cue,Â The New York Times on Saturday ran a lengthy story praisingÂ MSNBC host Joy Reid as a leader of the “resistance.” She has been extremely critical of President Donald J. Trump even to the point of becoming shooing pro-Trump guests off her show.
She, too, has persisted in pushing the “Russian collusion” narrative despite there being no evidence the Trump campaign and Moscow worked in tandem to defeat Hillary Clinton — after nearly two years’ worth of investigating by federal authorities and Congress.
Scarry noted in his column some “truths” about today’s major media:
— “Activism” at most news outlets is now acceptable, especially if it is Left-leaning activism:
CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta, who saved democracy when he challenged the administrationâ€™s immigration plan by quoting a cliche poem, said in a radio interview that the media need â€œa different kind of playbookâ€ when it comes to covering Trump. Like an old lady who feels sassy ordering a Sex on the Beach, Acosta defined his new journalism rules as, â€œThat means at times, you know, I bring a little attitude to what I do on a daily basis.â€ Acosta may be harmless on his own, but when the sea of media decide to rewrite the standards for covering a presidency, to assume an â€œattitude,â€ itâ€™s time to accept that theyâ€™re no longer journalists. Theyâ€™re activists.
— “Everything Trump says is controversial,” even when said ‘controversy’ has to be invented by the media:
In September 2016, then-President Obama acknowledged that now-former NFL Quarterback Colin Kaepernick may be kneeling for the national anthem in earnest, but he said that Kaepernick should â€œlisten to the pain that that may cause somebody who, for example, had a spouse or a child who was killed in combat.â€ It wasnâ€™t controversial to stand up for the countryâ€™s most recognized symbol until Trump did it, at which point it became racist. The Washington Postâ€™s liberal blogger Greg Sargent said Trumpâ€™s criticism of NFL players kneeling fit into a pattern of attacking â€œhigh-profile African Americans to feed his supporters’ belief that the system is rigged for minorities.â€ The NFL is not an exclusively black league, and patriotism isn’t racially divisive, but thatâ€™s a nuance that doesnâ€™t feed a fake controversy instigated by reporters.
— “Willful ignorance isn’t a bug, it’s a feature,” he wrote, explaining:
Itâ€™s possible to actually earn prestige in the national media, a field that formerly required an ongoing thirst for knowledge and understanding, by refusing to learn new things. In November of last year, New York Times columnist Charles Blow bragged that he refused to meet with then-President-elect Trump after the election, though he had come to the Times newsroom for an interview with staff. Itâ€™s more important for Blow that he stay ignorantly angry rather than learn anything that might change his mind from a face-to-face meeting. And if there is information readily available that disrupts the mediaâ€™s enduring suspicion that Trump is a closet klansman, writers find it best to simply ignore it.
Advertising disclaimer: Click here
What areÂ your thoughts?