(National Sentinel)Â Judicial Branch:Â The U.S. Ninth Circuit Court continued its reputation as being the most overturned of all federal court districts when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled earlier this week to indefinitely lift the lower courtâ€™s stay of President Donald J. Trumpâ€™s travel ban.
As reported by The Hill, the high court on Tuesday agreed to eliminate restrictions placed on Trumpâ€™s travel ban aimed at visitors from six countries known to harbor terrorists until further notice, giving the power back to the Executive Branch that no federal court ever had the authority to take.
The website noted further:
The court granted the governmentâ€™s request to blockÂ a federal appeals court ruling that said theÂ administration cannot banÂ refugees whoÂ have formal assurances from resettlement agencies or are in the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program.
The temporary stay was issued on Monday by Justice Anthony Kennedy and was subject to a response from the state of Hawaii, which has sued the Trump administration over the ban. That response did not come by a mid-Tuesday deadline. Later that same day, Kennedy issued a one-page order that blocks the Ninth Circuitâ€™s politically motivated ruling against Trump indefinitely.
Earlier this year two federal appeals courts stacked with Left-wing judges appointed by President Obama blocked substantial portions of a pair of travel bans issued shortly after Trump took office in January.
Next up: The Supreme Court will hear arguments in two cases that have since been combined that challenge the legality of the travel ban on Oct. 10. If the high court follows the Constitution and letter of the law like it is supposed to do (and like the Ninth Circuitâ€™s judicial activist judges should have done), the cause ought to be a slam-dunk for the White House.
Why? Because the law governing Trumpâ€™s actions couldnâ€™t be clearer and, since it was passed by Congress in proper constitutional manner, there should be nothing states or lower federal courts can do to impede the president.
Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 states: â€œWhenever the President finds that the entry ofÂ any aliens or of anyÂ class of aliensÂ into the United StatesÂ would be detrimental to theÂ interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for suchÂ period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens orÂ any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on theÂ entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriateÂ [emphasis added].â€ (Related: Trump getting slammed for calling EO a â€œtravel ban,â€ but the law makes clear thatâ€™s exactly what itÂ is.)
There is no ambiguity in that language. In fact, as federal statutes go, thatâ€™s about as plain as it gets.
This story originally appeared at Trump.news.
Advertising disclaimer: Click here