(National Sentinel) Climate Change Hoax: You may recall the outrage last week (that has yet to die down) over President Donald J. Trump’s decision to stick with his campaign pledge of withdrawing the United States from the Paris Climate Accords. Well, as we have oft stated, the “climate change” narrative is but a massive hoax perpetuated by globalists and would-be tyrants who seek nothing less than the destruction of capitalism and any opportunity to live freely and without centralized micromanagement.

Yes, we know. Global warming/climate change is “settled science,” and anyone who disagrees is a “climate change denier” who must be silenced. Except that it isn’t true.

As reported by Lifezette, you have every reason to be very skeptical of the climate change narrative you and our children are being spoon-fed daily:

When it comes to the global warming debate, both alarmists and critics agree on one thing: The earth has warmed by roughly 0.8 degrees Celsius over the past 150 years. It’s the cause of this warming, however, that remains in dispute. And while the public is constantly bombarded with messages about the evils of carbon dioxide emissions, there are actually compelling reasons to believe that contemporary global warming has been driven by rising solar output, not carbon dioxide.

Yes, carbon dioxide - that gas that is very necessary to sustain life on the planet is actually not killing us or the planet, as the hoaxers want you to believe:

It’s a rather stunning fact that CO2’s heating function declines so rapidly. But the general public likely has no awareness of this handicap, and climate activists are loath to discuss it. If pressed, they’ll grudgingly acknowledge CO2’s logarithmic limitations. They than gloss over the matter by proposing that water vapor will serve as the “positive feedback” needed to greatly magnify any future warming from CO2.

Significantly, water vapor is the primary “greenhouse” gas of the atmosphere — and is responsible for the overwhelming majority of heat absorption necessary to sustain life on the planet. Proponents of Anthropogenic (man-made) Warming Theory (AGW) hypothesize that, even though CO2 may be optically saturated at the current concentration of 0.04 percent, any increase in CO2 will still offer some minor increase in atmospheric heat content. They believe that this small quantity of additional heat will lead to a corresponding increase in atmospheric water vapor. And since water vapor is the main heat-absorbing gas of the atmosphere, that increased water content will absorb more heat, which will raise temperatures further, which will yield more water vapor, etc., creating a positive-feedback loop for additional warming.

This feedback assumption is the formula built into every computer model that now predicts future warming. But it contains a major flaw — and one that its proponents have never actually managed to solve. Water vapor added to the atmosphere inevitably transitions to clouds. And cumulus clouds not only reflect solar radiation back into space but also produce rain. And rainfall not only lowers surface temperatures but also scrubs CO2 from the atmosphere.

Uh-oh. There are those ugly, nasty facts getting in the way of a good (phony) narrative again.

The fact is CO2 emissions in the U.S., the “world’s biggest emitter” (actually China is, but again, those facts) have been falling for 15 years. And after 40 years, there is still no evidence or replicable studies that prove the AGW theory. None.

And yet Trump and the legions of Americans who with him on this just destroyed the world by pulling out of the Paris Accords? It is a bogus agreement that is primarily about the transfer of wealth from U.S. taxpayers to globalist entities who would redistribute it as they saw fit, via some nefarious slush account known as the Green Climate Fund (translation: Only trillions of dollars will finally “solve” the global warming issue).

Climate change is a hoax, folks, pure and simple. In fact, we believe that because it is a hoax being perpetuated in classrooms all over our country, it is akin to academic child abuse.


Would love your thoughts, please comment.x