(NationalSentinel) Politics:Â Political activist, MIT professor emeritus, scholar and author Noam Chomsky is no Trump supporter. But he’s also no fan of the neoliberal nonsense that passes for Democratic moralism these days.
Oh, and he’s not buying the “Russia stole the election to help Trump” BS, either.
In an interview withÂ Democracy Now that focused on Trump’s first 75 days in office, Chomsky, 88, was asked about the Democrat/corporate media narrative that somehow, someway, Russia influenced the outcome of our election and Team Trump colluded with Moscow in the effort:
JUANÂ GONZÃLEZ:Â Noam Chomsky, Iâ€™d like to ask you about something thatâ€™s been in the news a lot lately. Obviously, all the cable channels, thatâ€™s all they talk about these days, is the whole situation of Russiaâ€™s supposed intervention in American elections. For a country thatâ€™s intervened in so many governments and so many elections around the world, thatâ€™s kind of a strange topic. But I know youâ€™ve referred to this as a joke. Could you give us your view on whatâ€™s happening and why thereâ€™s so much emphasis on this particular issue.Â
NOAMÂ CHOMSKY:Â Itâ€™s a pretty remarkable fact thatâ€”first of all, it is a joke. Half the world is cracking up in laughter. The United States doesnâ€™t just interfere in elections. It overthrows governments it doesnâ€™t like, institutes military dictatorships. Simply in the case of Russia aloneâ€”itâ€™s the least of itâ€”the U.S. government, under Clinton, intervened quite blatantly and openly, then tried to conceal it, to get their man Yeltsin in, in all sorts of ways. So, this, as I say, itâ€™s consideredâ€”itâ€™s turning the United States, again, into a laughingstock in the world.
So why are the Democrats focusing on this? In fact, why are they focusing so much attention on the one element of Trumpâ€™s programs which is fairly reasonable, the one ray of light in this gloom: trying to reduce tensions with Russia?Â Thatâ€™sâ€”the tensions on the Russian border are extremely serious. They could escalate to a major terminal war. Efforts to try to reduce them should be welcomed. Just a couple of days ago, the former U.S. ambassador to Russia, Jack Matlock, came out and said he just canâ€™t believe that so much attention is being paid to apparent efforts by the incoming administration to establish connections with Russia. He said, â€œSure, thatâ€™s just what they ought to be doing.â€
So, meanwhile, this one topic is the primary locus of concern and critique, while, meanwhile, the policies are proceeding step by step, which are extremely destructive and harmful. So, you know, yeah, maybe the Russians tried to interfere in the election. Thatâ€™s not a major issue. Maybe the people in the Trump campaign were talking to the Russians. Well, OK, not a major point, certainly less than is being done constantly.Â And it is a kind of a paradox, I think, that the one issue that seems to inflame the Democratic opposition is the one thing that has some justification and reasonable aspects to it.
Ah, well,Â now it’sÂ obvious. Chomsky’s in the pay of Vladimir Putin, too.
The fact is, there is nothing to this narrative, and there’s never been anything to it. This phony story was concocted during and after the Trump victory to delegitimize his win and cast a pall of suspicion over his entire presidency.
And if that’s not true, then where is the evidence proving collusion?